{主关键词}

A | Session reviews work in 1st half of 2026, calls for strengthened political oversight China's top anti-graft body has vowed to advance discipline inspection and supervision work with higher standards and more concrete measures in the second half of 2026, focusing on strengthening political oversight, combating grassroots corruption and enhancing coordination among supervisory bodies. The sixth plenary session of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection of the Communist Party of China was held in Beijing on Saturday. Li Xi, a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee and secretary of the CCDI, addressed the session. The session reviewed work carried out in the first half of the year and called for steadfastly following the Chinese path to combating corruption while promoting high-quality development of discipline inspection and supervision. In the first half of this year, authorities nationwide filed 538,000 cases and punished 412,000 people, according to the CCDI and the National Commission of Supervision. CCDI plenary sessions are generally held at the beginning of a year, but may also be convened midyear for major matters, interim reviews, personnel elections or to implement major decisions of the CPC Central Committee. The session emphasized the importance of maintaining a correct view of performance and strengthening political oversight. It called for deepening political inspections, strictly enforcing discipline in leadership transitions and consistently improving conduct. The session called for enforcing discipline, combating corruption and continuing concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption at the people's doorsteps, in order to ensure the high-quality completion of all tasks for the year. Tasks closely connected Ji Yaping, a professor at Northwest University of Political Science and Law, said these tasks are closely connected. Political oversight should focus on whether officials truly follow a people-centered approach, implement central decisions, work pragmatically and respect objective laws, rather than pursue vanity projects or emphasize statements over results. Oversight itself should also avoid formalism and instead focus on effectiveness, Ji said. Yang Weidong, a professor at China University of Political Science and Law, said this year is both the start of the 15th Five-Year Plan period (2026-30) and a year when local leadership transitions are taking place, making implementation of central decisions and prevention of risks during personnel changes particularly important. Ji from Northwest University of Political Science and Law said that supervision during leadership transitions should ensure officials are selected according to standards of integrity and competence, while procedures remain lawful, transparent and subject to public oversight. The meeting also called for continued concentrated rectification of misconduct and corruption affecting people's daily lives. Experts said that punishment should be combined with prevention, with greater emphasis on regulating the exercise of grassroots power. Ji said that oversight should cover the authorization, exercise and supervision of power throughout the process to reduce opportunities for abuse. Li Zhiwei, a lecturer at China University of Political Science and Law's School of Discipline Inspection and Supervision, said the effectiveness of grassroots anti-corruption work should not be measured simply by the number of cases handled, but also by whether the number of recurring problems declines, governance improves and people see tangible benefits. Better coordination urged Additionally, the session emphasized systematic and bottom-line thinking, calling for better coordination among different forms of supervision. Experts said the discipline inspection authorities' work should be supervised by people's congresses, government departments and judicial, auditing and financial authorities, as well as the public and the media, so that different supervisory mechanisms reinforce rather than duplicate one another. Yang said such coordination should also help identify deeper institutional and governance problems through individual cases and prevent similar misconduct from recurring. The meeting also called for stronger internal oversight and continued efforts to make discipline inspection and supervision more standardized, law-based and regularized. In the first half of the year, 1,685 discipline inspection and supervision officials were placed under investigation and 1,535 were punished. Experts said that stronger self-supervision should be matched by better professional training, practical experience and internal checks. Ji called for narrowing capability gaps across regions and guarding against outside interference.
。 现在大家聊起国民党最狂、最自负的王牌将领,张口就是张灵甫。孟良崮一役,死守待援、宁死不退,傲气是出了名的。但很多人不知道,早在1946年东北战场,有一个师长的傲气,比张灵甫还要离谱。同样是黄埔四期出身,同样手握王牌精锐,他被重兵团团包围,上级主动派兵来救,他直接拒绝,非要靠自己一支部队硬闯突围,最后硬生生把一支百战王牌打没了。 这个人,就是千里驹师师长李正谊。 他带的第二十五师,隶属五十二军,在国军体系里是实打实的老牌主力。这支部队的名气,不是靠吹捧得来的,完全是抗战一场场硬仗拼出来的。早年长城抗战,军情紧急,没有汽车、没有机械化运输,全师士兵纯靠两条腿,长途急行军奔赴古北口前线。赶到战场来不及休整,直接顶上去挡日军主力,整场战役打下来伤亡极重,但死死顶住了日军的进攻。

B | 后来的台儿庄、武汉各大会战,二十五师从来都是打最苦的仗、顶最前线的位置。十几年抗战打下来,老兵极多,实战经验充足。

C | 抗战胜利后接收美式装备,改成半美械编制,火力、单兵素养,在东北国军里面,绝对是第一梯队的水平。 杜聿明对这支部队一直很看重,他早年就在二十五师当过副师长,深知这支部队的底子有多厚,也清楚这支部队能打、敢打。也正因如此,李正谊自打接手这支部队,心气就越来越高。仗打多了,胜仗拿多了,慢慢就飘了,压根瞧不上当时东北民主联军的战力。 1946年下半年,东北南满战场对峙激烈。国军全线压上,试图压缩我军活动范围、彻底肃清南满主力。当时各部稳步推进、互相掩护,唯独李正谊沉不住气。

D | 他一心想抢头功、抢战果,不顾兵团整体作战节奏,带着自己的二十五师拼命往前冲。 冲得太快,左右友邻全部跟不上,硬生生把自己打成了一支深入敌后的孤军。 东北民主联军四纵的指挥员,打仗极稳,一眼就看出了这个破绽。

E | 不硬拼、不硬碰,故意边打边退,步步示弱,一点点引诱李正谊往前追。李正谊越追越顺,越追越轻敌,根本没有勘察地形、没有防备埋伏,带着一万多主力,直接钻进了新开岭的山谷地带。 这个地方地形特殊,两边全是高山,中间一条窄路,典型的口袋地形,进得去、出不来。等李正谊反应过来不对劲的时候,已经晚了。四纵八个团迅速合围封死所有山口、退路、制高点,彻彻底底把二十五师困死在了山谷里。 消息传回沈阳司令部,杜聿明当场就急了。 他太懂战场形势,也太懂二十五师的价值。这支部队要是没了,东北国军的正面战力会直接掉一档。他不敢耽误,连夜安排部署,调动新六军、五十二军的增援部队火速赶去解围,同时直接发电报给李正谊,让他就地坚守,老老实实等着援军到位,千万别擅自突围。 正常的将领,到这一步,肯定是抓紧固守、等待救援。被重兵包围,孤军无援,等待增援是唯一的活路。 但李正谊不这么想。 他觉得自己的二十五师是老牌精锐、半美械配置,打了十几年仗,经验远超对手。他根本看不起包围自己的部队,从心底里不相信自己会被全歼。 他直接回电杜聿明,地面援军不用来,他不需要任何人救。

F | 只要求空军过来空投弹药、补给,靠着自己的二十五师,完全能自己打出包围圈,甚至能反打一波,击溃当面的阻击部队。 杜聿明拿他没办法,只能依他,安排战机进山空投。可新开岭全是深山峡谷,气流混乱,空投精度极差。大量弹药、物资根本落不到国军阵地,反倒很多落在了四纵的控制区里,等于白白给我方送补给,帮倒忙。 接下来的几天,新开岭的仗打得极其惨烈。 李正谊集中全师所有火炮,疯狂轰炸周边高地,组织一波又一波的敢死队冲锋,死死争夺老爷岭等关键制高点。二十五师的老兵确实能打,一度冲上去拿下部分阵地,攻防来回拉锯,双方伤亡都非常大。 但仗最怕耗。 孤军被围,没有补给、没有休整、没有援兵,打一波少一波。二十五师的弹药越打越少,老兵骨干不断牺牲,士气一天比一天低。

G | 反观四纵部队,死死咬住包围圈,顶着伤亡持续压缩阵地,不给对方半点喘息机会。 打到最后,二十五师彻底撑不住了。

H | 整师建制完全打散,指挥系统瘫痪,士兵要么战死、要么溃散、要么投降。这支从抗战一路打出来的千里驹王牌师,就这么彻底打没了。 大势已去之后,李正谊换上普通士兵的衣服,混在溃兵里想蒙混过关逃跑,最后还是被搜山的战士辨认出来,当场被俘。 新开岭这一仗,意义非常特殊。

I | 这是东北解放战争早期,我军第一次完整歼灭国军一个整建制主力师,直接打破了当时国军“精锐无敌”的嚣张气焰。 时至今日,翻看这场老战役,很多人依旧争议不断。 张灵甫被围孟良崮,是寄希望于外围大军合围反杀,死守待援,赌的是战局大势。而李正谊明明有生路、有援军,却凭着一身傲气盲目自大,硬生生把一支功勋王牌彻底葬送。 有人说他是悍将,只是性格太傲,输在了脾气上。

J | 也有人说,身为一军师长,轻敌自负、无视军令、葬送主力,根本就是失职。 同样是王牌师长,两种截然不同的选择,两种悲壮的结局。到底是战场形势造就了败局,还是将领的性格,注定了一整支部队的命运,至今依旧没有统一的答案。 返回,查看更多。
Current article:http://dlzd2j.diuhuairandaikaomangshangnen.buzz/list_ilvgmp/6uc0t.html
Published on:20:23:59
我的网站热门国内